[ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs
steve at wordtothewise.com
Thu Sep 30 08:15:25 PDT 2010
On Sep 30, 2010, at 4:05 AM, Charles Lindsey wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:52:01 +0100, John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>>>> This might be a good time to remind people that MLMs in their
>>>> current form are not broken, and any proposal that requires them to
>>>> stop doing something that they're currently doing, like rewriting
>>>> messages or adding message tags, is a non-starter.
>>> Since nothing requires anyone do anything with respect to DKIM, I'm
>>> hard pressed to imagine something that doesn't meet that requirement.
>> I was thinking of the various proposals to rewrite From: addresses, to
>> outlaw subject tags and message footers, and otherwise change the
>> behaviors that MLM users expect in order to make them conform to
>> various ideas of how DKIM and/or ADSP are supposed to work.
> But nowhere has anyone suggested REQUIRING any MLM to do any of those
> They are all offered as suggesstions for things MLMs MIGHT do do get
> themselves out of such DKIM-caused troubles as they find themselves in.
There are no DKIM-caused troubles they could possibly get themselves
If you mean ADSP, say ADSP. If you really mean DKIM you need
to expand on what sort of troubles you're talking about.
More information about the ietf-dkim