[ietf-dkim] Who signs what

Dave CROCKER dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Sep 16 08:25:54 PDT 2010



On 9/16/2010 7:31 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
> People should be free to use/sell 3rd party signing but that is outside
> the scope of DKIM/ADSP by intent.


This is a technical group, writing technical specifications.  So we need to be 
extremely careful in being accurate in how we describe things.

By its definition, ADSP targets the author's domain (in the From: field.)  This 
means that ADSP cannot be used for other domains.

However DKIM says nothing about any other field, author or otherwise.  It is 
equally happy with 1st-, 2nd-, 3rd-, and nth- party signatures.  And /that/ 
really is by intent.  (It always was the major enhancement of DKIM over Domainkeys.)

ADSP is not DKIM. It relies on it, but it goes far beyond it.

DKIM does not require or expect ADSP.

You said DKIM/ADSP. The implication is that the constraint you cited is relevant 
to DKIM.  But it isn't.  It's relevant (and in fact essential) only to ADSP.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list