[ietf-dkim] IETF RFC procedural question
hsantos at isdg.net
Thu Sep 16 06:31:54 PDT 2010
John Levine has reiterated and reminded "there's no such thing as a
"3rd party signing policy" in DKIM or ADSP, hence we should talk about it.
I don't wish to have trouble here.
I was planning of writing a I-D ADSP extension to add a new tag that
will propose a lite weight third party signer allow list. Doug Otis
has alway written a TPA (Third Party Authorization) extension for ADSP.
Is there a IETF RFC conflict with the functional specification of ADSP
designed to exclude third party signing consideration with ADSP
extensions that attempts to add third party signing practices?
Hector Santos, CTO
More information about the ietf-dkim