[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review

[Hector Santos]

SM wrote:
> Hi Murray,
> At 09:52 14-09-10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> How about: "It is important to us that this arrive at your inbox 
>> signed by us and unmodified.  You should not keep it if that is not the case."
>>
>> ...which is how I read the RFC.
> 
>  From Section 4.2.1 of RFC 5617:
> 
>    "All mail from the domain is signed with an
>     Author Domain Signature.  Furthermore, if a
>     message arrives without a valid Author Domain
>     Signature due to modification in transit,
>     submission via a path without access to a
>     signing key, or any other reason, the domain
>     encourages the recipient(s) to discard it."
> 
> As a receiver, I read this as the sender encouraging me to discard 
> the message if it is not DKIM verified.  From previous discussions on 
> this mailing list, it seems that the arguement was about reducing the 
> amount of bounces.

Small nit:  "as the AUTHOR DOMAIN encouraging me to discard ....."

-- 
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com