[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review
hsantos at isdg.net
Wed Sep 15 17:13:23 PDT 2010
> Hi Murray,
> At 09:52 14-09-10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> How about: "It is important to us that this arrive at your inbox
>> signed by us and unmodified. You should not keep it if that is not the case."
>> ...which is how I read the RFC.
> From Section 4.2.1 of RFC 5617:
> "All mail from the domain is signed with an
> Author Domain Signature. Furthermore, if a
> message arrives without a valid Author Domain
> Signature due to modification in transit,
> submission via a path without access to a
> signing key, or any other reason, the domain
> encourages the recipient(s) to discard it."
> As a receiver, I read this as the sender encouraging me to discard
> the message if it is not DKIM verified. From previous discussions on
> this mailing list, it seems that the arguement was about reducing the
> amount of bounces.
Small nit: "as the AUTHOR DOMAIN encouraging me to discard ....."
Hector Santos, CTO
More information about the ietf-dkim