[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review

[J.D. Falk]

On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> I don't think ADSP "discardable" means simply "throw it away" because it leaves out the "ifs" that are supposed to be in front of it.  That simplified interpretation presupposes the message will pretty much always arrive signed but not verifiable, meaning you basically don't believe DKIM can be trusted to work.
> 
> How about: "It is important to us that this arrive at your inbox signed by us and unmodified.  You should not keep it if that is not the case."
> 
> ...which is how I read the RFC.

And what the proponents intended when we wrote it.