[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review
John R. Levine
johnl at iecc.com
Mon Sep 13 07:10:44 PDT 2010
> What ADSP users want is irrelevant. This is about what MLMs want (which is
> most likely to ensure that submitted messages reach the whole of their
> list without problems).
Right. The easiest way to do so, assuming you believe that enough people
will use ADSP to matter, is to discard incoming messages with ADSP
settings that can cause trouble. If they say their mail is discardable,
take them at their word and discard it.
> Clearly, mailing lists that do things to the From: SHOULD (even MUST)
> sign, and any RFC documenting my proposal would include that.
Hmmn. Since you apparently believe this is a valuable and useful
proposal, could you remind us why, exactly, you're not writing it?
Writing I-Ds isn't hard. Lots of us do it all the time.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2304 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/attachments/20100913/57883159/attachment.bin
More information about the ietf-dkim