[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review
ietf-dkim at kitterman.com
Fri Sep 10 19:19:25 PDT 2010
"John Levine" <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>>It's not clear to me that there's consensus that anything qualifies as Best
>>Current. We have some small samples of a few things that some people have
>>tried, but I don't sense we're there yet.
>I hope that lists signing their outbound mail qualifies. Large
>providers Googlegroups and Yahoogroups do it, small providers
>including MAAWG and myself also do.
>Beyond that, you're right, we're at best guessing and at worst pulling
>stuff out of our whatevers.
Which brings us back to the question of the value of the DKIM working group writing an RFC that suggests people should sign mail. I don't think it has much.
I think an experimental document that amounts to something like "We've thought about this a lot and discussed it and collectively we've got NFC yet what's best yet. Here are some ideas ..." is what's most needed.
More information about the ietf-dkim