[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-02 review

[Hector Santos]

Steve Atkins wrote:
> On Sep 1, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> Lets say we set aside ADSP, as you suggest, and just consider 
> reputation evaluation. Do you believe there are any people
> who'd not find that that level of authentication tunneling 
> entirely adequate for their needs?

But ADSP is in scope of the charter work, and Reputation work is out 
of scope.  Unfortunately, we allowed this type of external reputation 
working mindset to alter, twist and turn the DKIM WG drafts creating 
confusion and consensus chaos making it hard to completing the 
chartered goals.

Accept POLICY as a WG work item and maybe we can come to complete this 
work and maybe many more systems can begin to get more DKIM/ADSP adoption.


-- 
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com