[ietf-dkim] Proposed changes to MLM draft

[Daniel Black]

On Tuesday 31 August 2010 04:03:45 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I'd like some help tackling the next version of the MLM draft.  People seem
> to have varying ideas about what should be removed and perhaps appear in
> other documents now.  I need some consensus on a direction in which to
> proceed.
> 
> So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following:
> 
> (1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that discusses
> signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no value-add items
> addressed, a DKIM MLM Informational that discusses possible value-add
> enhancements to MLMs in the DKIM world, and a non-WG BCP about mailing
> lists irrespective of DKIM (Dave's proposal);

-1. A single document is good for implementors.

> (2) Tear out everything having to do with making author signatures survive
> list relaying, dropping all that text altogether, and instead pointing
> people at S/MIME or PGP (John's proposal);

-1. Surviving signatures seems like a good long term goal.