[ietf-dkim] Proposed changes to MLM draft

[Douglas Otis]

  On 8/30/10 12:08 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
> Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> So can I please get some +1s/-1s on each of the following:
>>
>> (1) Split the document into three documents: A DKIM MLM BCP that
>> discusses signing and verifying in the context of MLMs with no
>> value-add items addressed, a DKIM MLM Informational that
>> discusses possible value-add enhancements to MLMs in the DKIM world, and
>> a non-WG BCP about mailing lists irrespective of DKIM (Dave's proposal);
> -1.  Please no more delays! Dave's suggestions are not required to fix
> a problem.  Your MLM is designed to FIX conflicts with current WG
> documents.
>
>> (2) Tear out everything having to do with making author signatures
>> survive list relaying, dropping all that text altogether, and
>> instead pointing people at S/MIME or PGP (John's proposal);
> -2. There are two parts to the above:
>
> -1. ADSP guidelines is a required engineering consideration for MLM.
> To remove can create interoperability problems.
>
> -1. Please No more dependencies on other technologies based on highly
> subjective non-scientific presumptions.

Agreed.

-Doug