[ietf-dkim] Proposed changes to MLM draft
dhc at dcrocker.net
Mon Aug 30 13:13:13 PDT 2010
On 8/30/2010 1:10 PM, Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
>> I'd suggest that the second item actually be a normative specification of
>> value-added features. This requires a change to the charter, and so it would
>> have to wait until completing the current charter.
> can you elaborate on what, in your view, would be part of this normative
merely as an example, I'll cite the usage of DKIM for subscription and
submission validation that has been mentioned a few times. Formally, using DKIM
that way is almost certainly a value-added semantic that goes beyond the
semantics of the DKIM signing specification. That's ok to do, but requires a
normative spec to define the behavior and meaning.
More information about the ietf-dkim