[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-01 review request
macfisherman at gmail.com
Tue Aug 10 08:21:53 PDT 2010
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk at cloudmark.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
>> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald
>> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 7:25 AM
>> To: Hector Santos
>> Cc: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-01 review request
>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Hector Santos <hsantos at isdg.net> wrote:
>> > So if the MLM simply follow the guideline to prohibit strict ADSP
>> > domain mail from entering its list environment, the downlink
>> > non-delivery ADSP problems would not be an issue anymore - no
>> > dependency on how downlinks are behaving and have no control over.
> I agree. But I'd also like to cover the case where an MLM elects not to handle ADSP at all, and the receivers have to deal with it. I think failing to do so leaves a fairly obvious hole.
> So I'm not sure what the objection is here. Is there something you guys want removed or changed?
No objection, just that MLMs MUST take ADSP into consideration.
More information about the ietf-dkim