[ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-01 review request

[Jeff Macdonald]

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <msk at cloudmark.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
>> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald
>> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 7:25 AM
>> To: Hector Santos
>> Cc: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-01 review request
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Hector Santos <hsantos at isdg.net> wrote:
>> > So if the MLM simply follow the guideline to prohibit strict ADSP
>> > domain mail from entering its list environment, the downlink
>> > non-delivery ADSP problems would not be an issue anymore - no
>> > dependency on how downlinks are behaving and have no control over.
>>
>> +1
>
> I agree.  But I'd also like to cover the case where an MLM elects not to handle ADSP at all, and the receivers have to deal with it.  I think failing to do so leaves a fairly obvious hole.
>
> So I'm not sure what the objection is here.  Is there something you guys want removed or changed?

No objection, just that MLMs MUST take ADSP into consideration.


-- 
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA