[ietf-dkim] Clarifying DKIM (etc.) expectations for mailing lists in the face of digests
iane at sussex.ac.uk
Mon Aug 9 04:35:10 PDT 2010
--On 4 August 2010 10:07:36 -0700 Dave CROCKER <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote:
> What is the security model that makes this expectation of preservation
> important and reasonable, given that it is so easily and whimsically
> violated by a common recipient-selectable setting?
I think the identified problem is one of deliverability, not security.
However, if there's a need to trust the original sender, and you don't
quite trust the list to get that right for you, then the implication is
that the recipient (the person with the need) should not select a digest
IT Services, University of Sussex
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
More information about the ietf-dkim