[ietf-dkim] Clarifying DKIM (etc.) expectations for mailing lists in the face of digests

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 2:10 PM
> To: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Clarifying DKIM (etc.) expectations for
> mailing lists in the face of digests
> 
>     A mailing list digest does not preserve DKIM signatures from (any
> of) the
> original messages, and this appears to be acceptable to the community.

Does "acceptable" here mean the community has considered the issue and elected to accept it the way it is, or the community is unaware of this as a consideration and operates calmly unaware of it as a possibility?