[ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM signature

[Murray S. Kucherawy]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Rolf E. Sonneveld
> Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 6:30 AM
> To: Bill Oxley @ Cox
> Cc: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] MLMs and the use of multipart/alternative to
> preserve original DKIM signature and at the same time add a new DKIM
> signature
> 
> Or is the general consensus that (in the long run) the reputation of
> the
> MLM domain is sufficient for the verifier/receiver of MLM distributed
> mail? I don't read that in the draft.

That's definitely my forward-looking view, but it's hard to include text in a document that points to something in the future with any degree of certainty.