[ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at cloudmark.com
Sat Jul 31 02:27:20 PDT 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 8:48 AM
> To: DKIM List
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach
> It may well be an ADSP issue - I've not looked in detail at the
> proposal - and it may be in scope for this document. (I suspect
> it's also a bad idea, but that's a separate discussion).
> It's definitely not a DKIM issue, though, and any labeling of a
> non-DKIM issue as "DKIM-friendly" would be misleading.
I concur that this specific issue is an ADSP one and not a DKIM (i.e. RFC4871) one. I don't have any problem being more clear about that.
But I disagree that ADSP is out of scope in general (re: the ADSP is or is not part of DKIM debate), unless we also want to remove all the other stuff in the lists draft about ADSP that people generally seem to like (currently 27 instances).
More information about the ietf-dkim