[ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach
steve at wordtothewise.com
Fri Jul 30 08:48:22 PDT 2010
On Jul 30, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
>> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins
>> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 8:56 PM
>> To: DKIM List
>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Alternative MAiling List Approach
>> On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>>> Should the MLM draft suggest From: replacement and addition of Reply-
>> To: as a specific example of DKIM-friendly MLM behavior?
>> No. DKIM doesn't really say much about either the From: address or the
>> Reply-To: address, so such a suggestion for "DKIM-friendly" behaviour
>> would be nonsensical.
>> It might be a reasonable suggestion for the benefit of other protocols,
>> but that's a different question.
> Is it not an ADSP issue though? Covering ADSP issues is (at least implicitly) in scope for this document.
It may well be an ADSP issue - I've not looked in detail at the
proposal - and it may be in scope for this document. (I suspect
it's also a bad idea, but that's a separate discussion).
It's definitely not a DKIM issue, though, and any labeling of a
non-DKIM issue as "DKIM-friendly" would be misleading.
More information about the ietf-dkim