[ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion

[MH Michael Hammer (5304)]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 3:07 PM
> To: Steve Atkins
> Cc: DKIM List
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong
> Discussion
> 
> On 06/02/2010 11:41 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
> > Fourth, as I mentioned above, even if all you said was valid,
> registering thousands of domains in order to make ADSP sort-of work
> against phishing isn't something that scales, either in terms of
domain
> name system nor the expense. If ADSP requires users to spend tend of
> thousands of dollars a year to maintain domain registrations in order
for
> it to have a significant effect on phishing then it's not something
that's
> really going to scale to more than a handful of senders.
> 
> I'd be willing to bet a good chunk of money that Paypay -- and lots of
> other domains --
> have this practice regardless, and preceding ADSP. ADSP use
supplements
> that current
> best practice for phishing target domains. Which is sort of the point.
> 
> Mike
>

Thousands of domains registered and counting. Been doing it well before
ADSP and view it as only one of the things that owners of abused domains
do.

Mike