[ietf-dkim] ADSP and Discardable (was Re: Lists "BCP" draft review)

[Rolf E. Sonneveld]

Scott Kitterman wrote:
> "Dave CROCKER" <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote:
>
>   
>> On 6/2/2010 8:08 AM, Al Iverson wrote:
>>     
>>> Agree. "Discard" and "silently discard" mean the same thing, in my
>>> opinion. Though, I am guilty of using the phrase "silently discard."
>>> Maybe in an attempt to be slightly over-specific.
>>>       
>> I do not recall seeing a dictionary or technical definition of "discard" that 
>> says anything at all about whether the discarder says anything at all.
>>
>> Taken on its own and without further technical specifications 'discard' does not 
>> direct, imply or request that the action be silent or noisy, and if noisy who 
>> gets to hear it.
>>     
>
> IIRC, this is by design since there was no consensus around what exactly to do.  Personally, I tend to favor not having messages silently vanish.
>   

+1

As stated before, I have not followed the entire discussion on ADSP in 
depth, so please bear with me. I could not find relevant items in the 
archives, but has there ever been suggested to have a 'rejectable' in 
addition to 'discardable' and 'all'?

/rolf