[ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion
brett.mcdowell at me.com
Thu May 27 12:15:49 PDT 2010
On May 27, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
> The problem with the cross examination that John and Steve are trying
> to perform is that the witnesses are under no obligation to respond. And,
> quite reasonably, they don't.
I appreciate the support, but I didn't want to leave anyone with the false impression that I had abandoned the debate just because I hadn't responded to the list in the past 22 hours or so. Although I do consider some of the counter-arguments as FUD and/or deliberately obtuse, I've actually tried to be responsive to all questions and comments on the list since joining. For better or worse I'm in for penny, in for a pound.
I've been in standards development for awhile... I'm not that easily discouraged ;-)
More information about the ietf-dkim