[ietf-dkim] more on discardable, was Lists "BCP" draft

[SM]

Hi Doug,
At 03:20 27-05-10, Douglas Otis wrote:
>Murray suggested that at one time, he might be willing.  It seems 
>better to first arrive at understanding the need.

Don't read anything in here as a statement of support for the draft.

Convince Daniel to write the code. :-)  It can be committed as a FFR.

>The draft includes open code that is needed to generate the tpa 
>labels, and has been

That's not how the project works.  Someone has to do the work and 
help the users when they have questions.  Obviously, any comments 
from marketing departments are discouraged.

>Why would unilateral authorization be troubling, since these are 
>also infrequent?

Once the code is out there, it may be easier to find an answer to 
that question.

Regards,
-sm