[ietf-dkim] more on discardable, was Lists "BCP" draft

SM sm at resistor.net
Wed May 26 21:11:42 PDT 2010


Hi Doug,
At 14:03 26-05-10, Douglas Otis wrote:
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dkim-tpa-label-03

I read that draft.  Are there any plans for an implementation?  By 
the way, the question is not to brush you off.

>When the domain administration receives DSNs or MARFs indicating a 
>problem, they should also be able to recognize whether it involves a 
>trusted third-party service based upon content.  A third-party 
>authorization method offers a practical means to extend ADSP "all" 
>with a method to mitigate possible disruptions.  IMHO, "discardable" 
>should be limited to domains not sending mail.

I'll stay out of the "discardable" and "all" discussion for now.

>Rather than using ADSP "discardable", it would be better to a 
>mandate the use of MX records.  BNAME zones will soon make the use 
>of address records to discover MTAs impossible.  As such, the 
>Address Record discovery should be depreciated.

I prefer not to comment. :-)

Regards,
-sm 



More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list