[ietf-dkim] more on discardable, was Lists "BCP" draft
sm at resistor.net
Wed May 26 21:11:42 PDT 2010
At 14:03 26-05-10, Douglas Otis wrote:
I read that draft. Are there any plans for an implementation? By
the way, the question is not to brush you off.
>When the domain administration receives DSNs or MARFs indicating a
>problem, they should also be able to recognize whether it involves a
>trusted third-party service based upon content. A third-party
>authorization method offers a practical means to extend ADSP "all"
>with a method to mitigate possible disruptions. IMHO, "discardable"
>should be limited to domains not sending mail.
I'll stay out of the "discardable" and "all" discussion for now.
>Rather than using ADSP "discardable", it would be better to a
>mandate the use of MX records. BNAME zones will soon make the use
>of address records to discover MTAs impossible. As such, the
>Address Record discovery should be depreciated.
I prefer not to comment. :-)
More information about the ietf-dkim