[ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at cloudmark.com
Wed May 26 11:20:28 PDT 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine
> Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 9:47 AM
> To: Brett McDowell
> Cc: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong
> Steve Atkins and I have explained why that's utterly implausible enough
> times that anyone who's interested can easily find it in the list
With all due respect, the two of you don't constitute "consensus", and I don't think abruptly stifling legitimate debate like this serves the working group or the communities we claim to serve at all.
You don't have to participate in the thought process if you find it irritating or repetitive, but please don't try to stop others, especially new people, that may want or need to go through it. You never know, they might have something new and valuable to offer. Or you could swing them around to your view, which builds consensus and only benefits you.
I've written code implementing all of this stuff, but I've never run it in an operational environment of the size or nature that Brett does. So I want to hear what he has to say until there's consensus to the contrary.
If you find it annoying, please just ignore or filter it.
More information about the ietf-dkim