[ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available
iane at sussex.ac.uk
Tue May 25 03:39:52 PDT 2010
--On 24 May 2010 14:33:13 -0700 Steve Atkins <steve at wordtothewise.com>
> On May 24, 2010, at 2:28 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
>>> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins
>>> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:42 PM
>>> To: DKIM List
>>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available
>>>>> Not at all. If we can agree that lists should reject discardable
>>>>> out of self defense, that's a good point to add to the BCP.
>>> Refusing signups from those domains is probably a bit extreme, though.
>> What about a warning at signup time if a "discardable" ADSP record is
>> found for the registrant's domain?
> Seems like a reasonable UX design to me but probably
> more a choice for the developer than a BCP, I think.
> (I think that refusing signups from ADSP using domains
> may also be a reasonable choice for the developer or list
> admin in some cases. But not something to put in a BCP.)
Why not? At least mention that it might be polite to make such a warning.
After all, the person signing up might have no clue at all that their
domain is 'discardable'.
I guess we can't claim that it's common practice, never might best common
practice. But it is, surely, a good idea.
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
IT Services, University of Sussex
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
More information about the ietf-dkim