[ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available
MH Michael Hammer (5304)
MHammer at ag.com
Thu May 20 07:09:43 PDT 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 5:29 PM
> To: J.D. Falk
> Cc: DKIM List
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available
> On 05/19/2010 02:21 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:
> > On May 19, 2010, at 7:53 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:
> >> +1. The current discussion was supposed to be about BCP. I agree
> >> Stephen with the caveat that if the group thinks re-opening ADSP
> >> discussion is important then include it in the re-charter.
> >> I'd like to wait until we hear some numbers about ADSP deployment
> >> experience.
> > +1
> Doesn't that sort of undermine the impetus to do a BCP on lists?
> Most of the sticky questions about lists are intertwined with ADSP,
> as evidenced by the recent messages here from paypal folks.
Let me clarify my statements. My point was that re-opening ADSP was not
part of the re-charter so unless the group feels it is important to
change ADSP we should stick to discussing the Lists BCP based on the way
that DKIM and ADSP are currently written.
If Brett or anyone else has data points that would impact the decision
as to whether the group sticks to a Lists BCP discussion based on
current practice/implementations or sets that aside to modify ADSP, now
is the time to present it.
>From my perspective, it would have to be very compelling for me to
support modifying ADSP at this point. ADSP is the DKIM tail and not vice
More information about the ietf-dkim