[ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available

[J.D. Falk]

On May 19, 2010, at 7:53 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote:

> +1. The current discussion was supposed to be about BCP. I agree with
> Stephen with the caveat that if the group thinks re-opening ADSP
> discussion is important then include it in the re-charter. Personally
> I'd like to wait until we hear some numbers about ADSP deployment and
> experience.

+1

--
J.D. Falk <jdfalk at returnpath.net>
Return Path Inc