[ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available
bmcdowell at paypal.com
Tue May 11 09:51:06 PDT 2010
On May 10, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> Would the WG like to bring it in and make it a WG document? If so, I volunteer to act as editor.
I'm an IETF newbie, so correct me if I'm wrong. But it seems you are only asking the binary question of whether the WG is willing to add this deliverable to it's scope, with your draft as a strawman, and you acting as the editor. You are not asking us if we have rough consensus on the contents of the document in its current form. Correct?
>From what I see on the list, there is clear consensus that this document should be produced as a WG document (which I support as well). So can we consider that question closed?
Now that it's a WG document, what's the review process... do we just chime in with comments and suggested edits on this thread?
More information about the ietf-dkim