[ietf-dkim] Lists "BCP" draft available

[Dave CROCKER]

On 5/10/2010 2:28 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:
> I think we could write normative language for what MLM software MUST NOT do
> if it wants to pass DKIM-signed messages through unscathed.


Seems an odd thing to make normative, since all that is entailed is not breaking 
the signature, and the details of what goes into a signature are in the base 
DKIM signing spec.

This actually winds up arguing for not worrying about the subtleties or niceties 
of normative language and instead just trying to provide discussion that is 
largely tutorial.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net