[ietf-dkim] Wrong Discussion - was Why mailing lists should strip DKIM signatures

[Alessandro Vesely]

On 30/Apr/10 20:22, John Levine wrote:
> Is there some long-standing toxic effect of mailing lists other than
> that they don't fit the simple identity models used by recently
> devised authentication schemes?

The opt-in mechanism, I'd say. There's no standardized way for 
subscribers' servers to learn about subscriptions. Monthly reminders 
resemble a time-distributed database w.r.t. what could be provided 
otherwise. (Not to mention whitelisting.)

-- 
I set the footer, in order to check whether signatures without "l=" 
would have a chance to survive, if they weren't stripped: if it ends 
up doubled, they wouldn't.

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html