[ietf-dkim] list vs contributor signatures, was Wrong Discussion

[Powers, Jot]

On 4/29/10 10:34 AM, "Michael Thomas" <mike at mtcc.com> scribbled:
> On 04/29/2010 10:23 AM, Al Iverson wrote:
>> As John Levine mentioned previously, your own posts to this list fail
>> authentication and end up in many of our spam folders because of
>> Paypal's SPF policy. I'm not against strong authentication policies --
>> but I'm wondering how you personally expect to be able to post to
>> mailing lists without acceptance of this proposal? The status quo
>> interferes with your ability currently, and broader adoption of
>> authentication on the receiving side will only make it worse.
> 
> The solution to a misconfigured SPF/ADSP record is for every receiver to
> patch it up post-hoc? That makes absolutely no sense.

I must have missed it.  What exactly does PayPal have misconfigured?

Off-list is fine.

-Jot
-- 
Jot Powers   jpowers at paypal.com