[ietf-dkim] Why mailing lists should strip DKIM signatures
steve at wordtothewise.com
Sun Apr 25 17:26:31 PDT 2010
On Apr 25, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Tony Hansen wrote:
> I found this part of Allessandro's message somewhat scary. I thought we
> got past the point where l=0 was considered a viable option for anyone
> to use?
Unless receivers treat any DKIM signature with an l= field as an
unsigned message (or as a sign of email that should be rejected
altogether) then l=0 is a viable option for senders to use.
More information about the ietf-dkim