[ietf-dkim] DKIM errata 1385 (TXT records)
tony at att.com
Thu Jan 28 07:44:31 PST 2010
Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com wrote:
> We still have couple of unprocessed errata for RFC 4871 left.
> Let's try to handle an easy one first:
> To me it looks like Section 126.96.36.199 does already specify the
> necessary details:
> Strings in a TXT RR MUST be concatenated together before use with no
> intervening whitespace. TXT RRs MUST be unique for a particular
> selector name; that is, if there are multiple records in an RRset,
> the results are undefined.
> Thus, the errata appears unnecessary. Unless I hear objections within
> a week or so, I'll mark this as "Rejected" (with a note pointing to
> Section 188.8.131.52)
More information about the ietf-dkim