[ietf-dkim] IPR disclosures, was Collecting re-chartering questions
johnl at iecc.com
Mon Jan 25 08:51:48 PST 2010
>> 1. Advance DKIM base to Draft Standard
>I'd require Yahoo! Inc's IPR to be upgraded to the current GPL release
>before that. (See https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/693/)
The reference to the GPL looks to me like it only covers the old
Sourceforge DK library, which I don't think anyone uses any more. The
patent, which is what's important, is covered by a separate license
that Yahoo wrote.
Even if Yahoo were willing, this would involve negotiations with their
lawyers which always takes a long time. What would be the advantage
to anyone of demanding license changes for obsolete code?
More information about the ietf-dkim