[ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal

[hector]

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:


> I'd invite the people that have been involved in those conversations to state specifically what areas draft-ietf-dkim-deployment could cover to close these gaps.


I seek one thing:

Codify the semantics regarding ADSP implementation vs Forwarder DKIM 
implementation.

If thats a problem, then ADSP needs to be pulled.  We don't need 
evidence to show there is a problem but only engineering inference 
that there will be a problem if there is any growth in either part 
with a clear collision.

--
HLS