[ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal

[Barry Leiba]

>> I think "dormant" will work, if this is the route we decide to take.
>> But I think we won't be completely dormant, anyway, if we're gathering
>> data and reviewing the informational documents, and perhaps updating
>> them.
>
> I think it would be nice if we had (if already done, reestablish) a
> foundation for what exactly we are looking for during this "dormant"
> period.

Agreed.

>   - Personal Community/Network (AKA Local Sites) Statistics?
>   - Growth of Incoming Signed Messages
>       - Percentage of Spam
>       - Percentage of 1st, 3rd party
>       - Percentage of failed hashing from EyeBalled Good guys.
>   - Growth of ADSP domains
>   - Growth of Open Standard Reputations Systems
>   - Growth of Open API Commercial Reputations Systems
>   - Exclusivity Analysis (What If)
>       - What if your other current filters (i.e. SPF)
>         was not around?
>       - What if Remailers honored ADSP?
>   - FOG (Flash Of Genius) protocol fitting solutions
>
> etc, some form of foundation for producing a formal report after 1+
> years or at some group agreed date.

That sounds like a good set to start discussion with.  And, yes, I
like the idea of having a report on the work-item list.

Barry, as participant