[ietf-dkim] How about that DKIM charter update proposal
ietf-dkim at kitterman.com
Mon Oct 19 11:59:26 PDT 2009
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:58:55 -0700 "Murray S. Kucherawy"
<msk at cloudmark.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
>> bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of John Levine
>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 1:31 PM
>> To: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
>> Cc: barryleiba at computer.org
>> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] How about that DKIM charter update proposal
>> Re the ADSP data collection, I'd like to add a third option to move it
>> to Historic if ADSP turns out to be as useful as I think, but I
>> realize this is unlikely to be a popular suggestion.
>How about "Experimental"?
Why is it more experimental now than when it was published?
>From the beginning, I have not had the impression that the policy piece of
the charter has not been taken very seriously. Publishing All/Discardable
does take some significant effort to make sure all of an entities MTAs are
reliably signing. I think it's way premature to have an opinion about if
it will get used or not.
More information about the ietf-dkim