[ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, it's' both!
iane at sussex.ac.uk
Mon Oct 19 03:11:52 PDT 2009
--On 17 October 2009 17:57:30 +0000 John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:
>> But whatever, we may need a straw poll followed by a clarification RFC,
>> to settle once and for all whether Levine or Thomas is canon.
> Mike's version is what the RFC says. My version is the way that way
> too many people will misunderstand it, no matter what it actually
Then it needs explicit clarification in implementation guides. I think that
what the RFCs say is good. It's enough to give real benefit to recipients,
whereas the misinterpretation will make ADSP practically unusable (as if
only "discardable" existed).
> You've illustrated my point very well. Thanks!
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
IT Services, University of Sussex
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
More information about the ietf-dkim