[ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, it's' both!

[Ian Eiloart]

--On 17 October 2009 17:57:30 +0000 John Levine <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:

>> But whatever, we may need a straw poll followed by a clarification RFC,
>> to settle once and for all whether Levine or Thomas is canon.
>
> Mike's version is what the RFC says.  My version is the way that way
> too many people will misunderstand it, no matter what it actually
> says.

Then it needs explicit clarification in implementation guides. I think that 
what the RFCs say is good. It's enough to give real benefit to recipients, 
whereas the misinterpretation will make ADSP practically unusable (as if 
only "discardable" existed).

> You've illustrated my point very well.  Thanks!
>
> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html



-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/