[ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal

[Stephen Farrell]

SM wrote:
>>>  The working group is now ready to switch its focus to refining and
>>>  advancing the DKIM protocols.  The current deliverables for the
>>>  DKIM working group are these:
>>>
>>>  * Advance the base DKIM protocol (RFC 4871) to Draft Standard.
> 
> The base DKIM protocol is updated by RFC 5672.  In my opinion RFC 
> 4871 cannot be advanced to Draft Standard status without RFC 5672.

Yes. The intent as I understand it is not to declare 4871 as DS but
to write a 4871bis draft that folds in the changes from 5672.

S.

> 
>>>  * Collect data on the deployment and interoperability of the
>>>    Author Domain Signing Practices protocol (RFC 5617), and
>>>    determine if/when it's ready to advance on the standards track.
>>>    Update it at Proposed Standard or advance it to Draft Standard,
>>>    as appropriate.
> 
> I cannot support advancing RFC 5617 to Draft Standard.  The message 
> posted by one of the WG Chairs at 
> http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2009q4/012747.html summarizes 
> why I don't think that it is useful to have the discussion.
> 
> Regards,
> -sm 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>