[ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP?
ops.lists at gmail.com
Sun Oct 11 19:11:15 PDT 2009
I'd say just deprecate ADSP. It has a niche application if at all and
I dont foresee any kind of widespread deployment beyond in a few
senders / ESPs.
That kind of technology doesnt need an RFC for it.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:32 AM, hector <gmail.sant9442 at winserver.com> wrote:
> You can't use STATISTICS - you must use protocol methodology - LOGIC.
> You can't tell the world RFC 5617 is available as a DKIM "Add-on"
> technology YET support the intentional ignorance of its existence or
> hope that no one will support it.
> You can't have it both ways. Either you will support RFC 5617 or you,
> as the author of RFC 5617 propose to get rid of it.
> Either way, as a SMTP and LIST SERVER developer, it will at least give
> us and in the general sense, all SMTP and LIST SERVER developers, a
> protocol consistent methodology to increase DKIM adoption and unleash
> it to our customers.
More information about the ietf-dkim