[ietf-dkim] DKIM adoption

[Dave CROCKER]

Bill.Oxley at cox.com wrote:
>      , but I have yet to see a statement
> as either:
> -an email not signed with DKIM will have its reputation lowered (less 
> likely to pass filters)
> -an email signed with DKIM will have its reputation increased (more 
> likely to pass filters)


The presence or absence of a DKIM signature carries no inherent semantics about 
reputation of the signer.

Consequently anyone increasing or lowering a reputation assessment based on the 
presence or absence of a DKIM signature is going far beyond its stated purpose.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net