[ietf-dkim] DKIM adoption

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

I am not ready to make that statement yet. Considering that a lot of spam has valid DKIM signatures I am not sure when I will make that statement
________________________________
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Franck Martin
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 6:23 PM
To: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
Subject: [ietf-dkim] DKIM adoption

Looking at DKIM adoption. I have seen statements that some mailers will do DKIM based reputation if available, but I have yet to see a statement as either:
-an email not signed with DKIM will have its reputation lowered (less likely to pass filters)
-an email signed with DKIM will have its reputation increased (more likely to pass filters)

I think if there were some postmasters making such statement it would boost the adoption of DKIM.

I think stating that some postmasters are moving to domain based reputation is just encouraging the status quo of not DKIM signing to stay in IP based reputation.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/attachments/20090803/a9db9b6e/attachment.html