Second quarter 2009 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Wed Apr 1 02:18:49 PDT 2009
Ending: Tue Jun 30 17:53:34 PDT 2009
Messages: 700

• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   MH Michael Hammer (5304)
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Michael Adkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Michael Adkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Michael Adkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Michael Adkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Michael Adkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Michael Adkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Michael Adkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Michael Adkins
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] who's using l=   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] who's using l=   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Steve Atkins
• [ietf-dkim] jabber logs into working group mailing list archives?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] jabber logs into working group mailing list archives?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] draft-ietf-dkim-overview-11   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-04.txt   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Publishing news about DKIM progress   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] evangelizing dkim   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- z: Copied header fields   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- t=y: Domain is testing DKIM   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- other features   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] who's using l=   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-05.txt   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-06.txt]   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Removing A-R headers   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Shift Thurs or Fri?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Shift Thurs or Fri?   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] Stats about DKIM adoption   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-07.txt]   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Dave CROCKER
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] A meta-note: stepping back from the feature discussion   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Jon Callas
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   DKIM Chair
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   DKIM Chair
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support   Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Dave Crocker
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Mark Delany
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   J.D. Falk
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] 4871bis/4871 interop   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Stephen Farrell
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Jim Fenton
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   HLS
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Byung-Hee HWANG
• [ietf-dkim] draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header published as RFC 5451   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-04   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered: sha1 vs sha256   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Tony Hansen
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Hector
• [ietf-dkim] Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-overview (DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Service Overview) to Informational RFC   The IESG
• [ietf-dkim] Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata (RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures -- Update) to Proposed Standard   The IESG
• [ietf-dkim] Document Action: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Service Overview' to Informational RFC   The IESG
• [ietf-dkim] Protocol Action: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Author Domain Signing Practices (ADSP)' to Proposed Standard   The IESG
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Al Iverson
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Al Iverson
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Al Iverson
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Al Iverson
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Al Iverson
• [ietf-dkim] Deiva Shanmugam   Al Iverson
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Cullen Jennings
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Scott Kitterman
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Murray Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Murray Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-04   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x=   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] 4871bis/4871 interop   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Removing A-R headers   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Murray S. Kucherawy
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Eliot Lear
• [ietf-dkim] jabber logs into working group mailing list archives?   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] jabber logs into working group mailing list archives?   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Section 2.10 Agent or User Identifier (AUID) correction: (resent)   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP 4.2.1. Record Syntax clarication   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] who's using l=   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsawg-operations-and-management (Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management of New Protocols and Protocol Extensions) to BCP   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   Barry Leiba
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] A question about public key formats   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] who's using l=   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] misusing DKIM, was chained signatures, was l= summary   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] 4871bis/4871 interop   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] incompetent list managers, was chained signatures, was l= summary   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   John Levine
• [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x=   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x=   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   John R. Levine
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Charles Lindsey
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] who's using l=   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Jeff Macdonald
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] Stats about DKIM adoption   Franck Martin
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing (resent)   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Section 2.10 Agent or User Identifier (AUID) correction: (resent)   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Last Call: draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata (RFC 4871 DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures -- Update) to Proposed Standard   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Lingering discussion on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Removing A-R headers   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   Doug Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] On the Selector   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] 4871bis/4871 interop   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- h: Acceptable hash algorithms   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Douglas Otis
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered: sha1 vs sha256   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Suresh Ramasubramanian
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Paul Russell
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Paul Russell
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x=   Paul Russell
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Paul Russell
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   SM
• [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque   SM
• [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine   SM
• [ietf-dkim] draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header published as RFC 5451   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   SM
• [ietf-dkim] A meta-note: stepping back from the feature discussion   SM
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   SM
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   SM
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   SM
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   SM
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   SM
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   SM
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Florian Sager
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871-Update Nit - Original Message Submitter   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP 4.2.1. Record Syntax clarication   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP 4.2.1. Record Syntax clarification   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] (offtopicish) RFC 4871 Word Cloud   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing   Hector Santos
• [ietf-dkim] Check out my photos on Facebook   Deiva Shanmugam
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] Urgent: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10 and RFC 5451   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Siegel, Ellen
• [ietf-dkim] FYI: ENMA 1.1.0 Released   SUZUKI Takahiko
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] To meet, or not, in Stockholm   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] who's using l=   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- l= and x=   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x: Signature expiration   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Removing A-R headers   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Michael Thomas
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] ADSP Informative Note on parent domain signing   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] Whither 4871bis?   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] let's screw up a good thing   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata   Wietse Venema
• [ietf-dkim] Author Signature vs. Author Domain Signature / Internal vs External threats   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Update of RFC4871 Appendix D. MUA Considerations (resent)   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Features that could be reconsidered as part of the bis process   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] General Feedback loop using DKIM   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   Bill.Oxley at cox.com
• [ietf-dkim] A meta-note: stepping back from the feature discussion   hector
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   hector
• [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text forrfc4871-errata (resend)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] Assessors   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)   hector
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-03.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-11.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-04.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-10.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-05.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-overview-12.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-05.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-06.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-07.txt   Internet-Drafts at ietf.org
• [ietf-dkim] AUTO: Jill Resnick is out of the office. (returning 05/26/2009)   Jill.Resnick at macys.com
• [ietf-dkim] The "real" (remaining) errata   Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com
• [ietf-dkim] IETF Last Call summary for draft-ietf-dkim-overview   Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com
• [ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)   Pasi.Eronen at nokia.com
• [ietf-dkim] Deiva Shanmugam   deiva shanmugam

Last message date: Tue Jun 30 17:53:34 PDT 2009
Archived on: Tue Jun 30 17:53:51 PDT 2009

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...