[ietf-dkim] Modified Introduction text for rfc4871-errata (resend)
fenton at cisco.com
Tue Jun 16 11:42:19 PDT 2009
Dave CROCKER wrote:
> Meant to include this, for completeness:
> Replacing 'reputation' with 'assessment', here's the latest version:
I'm better with this version; thanks. I do feel that we're effectively
using "assessment" as a proxy for "the R-word" which goes back to the
concern I voiced long ago about not requiring the verifier to pass on
other values including i= if they're present. It seems to me that this
is effectively dictating the operation of the (wink wink, nudge nudge)
assessor. But I won't belabor that, since it seems that the rough
consensus felt otherwise.
The important point now is responding to Cullen's concerns that the new
text doesn't clarify things adequately.
More information about the ietf-dkim