[ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

Okay, I would like to keep what we have, removing pieces is not a good idea, people don't have to use the tags if they don't want to and we MAY have a need for them in the future. The tags were discussed at length during the original draft. Removing them after the fact doesn't help or hurt adoption rates.

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 3:46 PM
To: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?

Come on, people: stop being snarky.
Dave asked a legitimate question about the DKIM base spec, which has
been Proposed Standard for two years now, and which we're considering
progressing to Draft Standard.

Whether you like ADSP or not, it isn't part of this.

Barry
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html