[ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)

[Charles Lindsey]

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:34:19 +0100, Michael Thomas <mike at mtcc.com> wrote:

> J.D. Falk wrote:
>> Michael Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> There is *NO* *REASON* to strip signatures. NONE.
>>>
>>> In fact it is HARMFUL.
>>

> Well for starters, RFC4871 section 3.5:
>

> And from RFC2822 section 3.6:
>

> And then RFC4871 section 4.2 goes on to say:

In general +1 to all that, though I am not as passionate as Michael, and  
can accept that hopelessly broken signatures _might_ occasionally be  
removed.

But by and large, I do not want to prevent Forensics.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl at clerew.man.ac.uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5