[ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)
mike at mtcc.com
Wed Jun 10 09:58:45 PDT 2009
J.D. Falk wrote:
> Charles Lindsey wrote:
>> What I think it makes clear that we are in serious need of some document
>> to provide Best Practice for how mailing list expanders should handle
>> DKIM, and I think that is something that this WG needs to take on board.
> Feel free to use my article on CircleID as a starting point:
> It's so simple and obvious (once you move from theory to practice) that I'm
> not sure if it's worth the WG's time.
There is *NO* *REASON* to strip signatures. NONE.
In fact it is HARMFUL.
More information about the ietf-dkim