[ietf-dkim] list expanders (was Re: chained signatures, was l= summary)

[Michael Thomas]

J.D. Falk wrote:
> Charles Lindsey wrote:
> 
>> What I think it makes clear that we are in serious need of some document
>> to provide Best Practice for how mailing list expanders should handle
>> DKIM, and I think that is something that this WG needs to take on board.
> 
> Feel free to use my article on CircleID as a starting point:
> 
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/dkim_for_discussion_lists/
> 
> It's so simple and obvious (once you move from theory to practice) that I'm 
> not sure if it's worth the WG's time.

There is *NO* *REASON* to strip signatures. NONE.

In fact it is HARMFUL.


	Mike