[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type
ops.lists at gmail.com
Sun May 31 06:21:37 PDT 2009
To save bandwidth - I'm +1 on steve's list - in particular the ones
you posted surveys for, so far.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Dave CROCKER <dcrocker at bbiw.net> wrote:
>> TXT RR tags
>> k: Key type
>> Much the same as h=, with the added issue that there's only one
>> possible key type right now, and if there were a need for k= in the
>> future it could be added in the same RFC that adds support for
>> anything other than RSA.
More information about the ietf-dkim