[ietf-dkim] who's using l=
johnl at iecc.com
Sat May 30 17:04:30 PDT 2009
>However, if no one has deployed with l= signatures, then it can be
>safely removed *because* no one is using it.
Looking through my log which now has over 13,000 DKIM signatures from
incoming mail, there's about 300 with l= and nearly all of those are
Anyone from Cisco know whether you're doing anything with l= as
opposed to just putting it in the signature?
Related question: whether or not you sign with l=, does anyone have
any software that does anything with l= other than use it to decide
how much of the body to check? Anyone seen an MUA that uses it to
manage message display? A spam filter that uses l= in its secret
sauce? Any use of l= at all?
More information about the ietf-dkim