[ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type
dcrocker at bbiw.net
Sat May 30 10:15:41 PDT 2009
Steve Atkins posted a list of suggested DKIM features to drop.
This note is intended to anchor a discussion thread for discusses one of those
> TXT RR tags
> k: Key type
> Much the same as h=, with the added issue that there's only one
> possible key type right now, and if there were a need for k= in the
> future it could be added in the same RFC that adds support for
> anything other than RSA.
Please discuss arguments for and against dropping this.
More information about the ietf-dkim