[ietf-dkim] l= summary, as I see it
mike at mtcc.com
Sat May 23 20:48:49 PDT 2009
Tony Hansen wrote:
> However, if no one has deployed with l= signatures, then it can be
> safely removed *because* no one is using it.
> But if *anyone* is signing with it, then it cannot be safely removed as
> part of moving to Draft Standard. Then such a change would require
> recycling back at Proposed Standard.
Cisco does. I'm pretty sure that the sendmail milter has the ability to
also, so who
knows how many people use it.
More information about the ietf-dkim